Internal Revenue Service Convictions for Fiscal 2008
Lead Charge: 31 USC 5324 - Structuring transactions to evade reporting requirement
Table 1: Criminal Convictions
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during
the first six months of fiscal 2008 the government reported 25 new
convictions for matters referred by the
Internal Revenue Service with a lead charge of "31 USC 5324 -
Structuring transactions to evade reporting requirement". If this activity
continues at the same pace, the annual total of convictions will be 50
for this fiscal year. According to the case-by-case information
analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this
estimate is up 194 percent over the past fiscal year when the number of
convictions totaled 17.
The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted for offenses are
based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of
Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys
(see Table 1).
Compared to five years ago when there were 12, the estimate of fiscal 2008
convictions of this type is up 317 percent. Convictions over the past
year are much higher than they were ten years ago. Overall, the data
show that convictions of this type are up 72.4
percent from the level of 29 reported in 1998 and up 355 percent from
the level of 11 reported in 1988.
The long term trend in convictions for these matters going back to
FY 1988 is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1
represent the number of convictions of this type recorded each
fiscal year. Projected figures for the current fiscal year are shown. Each
presidential administration is distinguished by the color of the bars.
Figure 1: Criminal Convictions of 31 USC 5324 over the last 20 years
In contrast to these 25 convictions, during first six months of fiscal 2008 federal prosecutors turned down 75 additional referrals for which the IRS had recommended criminal prosecution with this recorded lead charge.
Thus, for every successful prosecution, federal prosecutors refused to file prosecutions against three additional suspects IRS referred.
The most frequent reason given by U.S. Attorney offices for refusing to go forward with IRS prosecution recommendations was that there was "weak or insufficient admissible evidence." For others, prosecutors felt there was a "lack of evidence of criminal intent," or "no federal offense was evident," or "minimal federal interest or no deterrent value." Only two were turned down because of the "lack of prosecutive resources."
In general, the IRS has had less success in getting referrals prosecuted that were classified under this lead charge than for tax evasion, fraud and false statements, and other charges under Title 26 of the U.S. Code.
Leading Program Areas
Figure 2: Specific types of convictions
Cases were classified by prosecutors into more
specific types. The single largest number of convictions of these
matters through March 2008 was for "Government Regulatory", accounting
for 64 percent of convictions. See Figure 2. The
second largest number of matters were Convictions filed under the
program area of "White Collar Crime " (20 percent) .
The "Other" category in Figure 2 is comprised of a diverse group of
programs. The largest specific program within the "Other" category
was "Narcotics/Drugs" (8 percent).
Ranked Judicial Districts
 Table 2: District Listing
|
Convictions of this type have been registered for 17 of the nation's 94 judicial districts during the first six months of fiscal 2008. Those districts are listed in Table 2.
The Eastern District of
California (Sacramento) and Southern District of New York
(Manhattan) — with 3 convictions — were the most active through March 2008, with three convictions each.
The District of Connecticut,
Southern District of Florida (Miami), Eastern District of Michigan
(Detroit) and Eastern District of Wisconsin (Milwaukee) were the next most active, with two convictions apiece.
A single conviction was recorded for each of the remanining eleven districts.
Clicking on the "More" link will give you the opportunity to obtain a report targeted to convictions of these matters in the Judicial District indicated in the table.
|
|